An ECSEL Research and Innovation Action (RIA) primarily consists of activities aiming to establish new knowledge and/or to explore the feasibility of a new or improved technology, product, process, service, method, tool or solution. For this purpose they may include applied research, technology development and/or method/tool and integration, testing and validation on a small-scale prototype in a laboratory or simulated environment.
The activities have their centre of gravity at TRL 3-4.
A RIA proposal is characterised by:
The domains represent the demand side of technologies, and the development of new technologies represents the supply side of technologies.
The technologies in the ECSEL Multiannual Strategic Plan (MASP) 2017 include semiconductor processing, equipment and materials; design technology; Cyber-Physical Systems, Integrated Smart System and Safety and Security.
Full details of the topics open for proposals, terms and conditions for participation and funding budgets are available in the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017.
The budget breakdown for this call is given in the work programme:ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017 and in the topic header above.
For the most up to date figures of the ECSEL Participating States budget commitments check the ECSEL JU web site: http://www.ecsel.eu
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Annex 4.A and Annex 6 of the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in Annex 4.B and Annex 6 of the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017.
Proposal page limits and layout:
The following Page Limits for ECSEL-RIA and ECSEL-IA actions apply:
Chapter on excellence - 60 pages
Chapter on impact - 100 pages
Chapter on implementation - 100 pages
For the layout requirements, please, refer to Part B (Technical Annex) of the ECSEL proposal template
Calls 2017 and to ECSEL Lighthouse Initiative - Expression of Interest (EoI) Template
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold:
Annexes 2 and 3 of the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017 describe the details of the evaluation and selection process under subsections b) Specific Conditions. The evaluation criteria, scoring and thresholds are also described there.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the ECSEL JU Calls – Guide for applicants 2017.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1 (PO - "Proposal Outline" stage): maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2 (FPP - "Full Project Proposal" stage): maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates to be filled in will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
ECSEL Research and Innovation Action (ECSEL-RIA) and ECSEL Innovation Action (ECSEL-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates (both EU and national) are described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below. They include the following:
Part B - Technical Annex
ECSEL Lighthouse Initiative - Expression of Interest (EoI) Template
Part C - Templates for the applicants in those Participating States requesting a Part C are available as described in Annex 6 of the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information - described in Annex 4.D of the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017.
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – the definitions described in Annex 4.C of the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017 apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – the provisions described in Annex 4.E of the ECSEL JU Work Plan 2017 apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
This topic participates per default in the open access to research data pilot which aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by projects:
- The pilot applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available for open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan (to be provided within six months after the project start).
- Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they are part of the Pilot, and will not be penalised for opting out of the Pilot.
- Projects can at any stage opt-out of the pilot.
The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.
Further information on the Open Research Data Pilot is made available in the H2020 Online Manual.