The preparation of a proposal is no simple matter: a winning project idea must be identified, the right partners must be contacted and involved, the application form and all supporting documents must be duly filled out. Above all, outstanding coordination capacities and large experiences of proposal writing are essential for a successful submission. Applicants’ organisations often lack these competences, which makes the process much longer and complex.
This is where Up2Europe Experts come into play!
Up2Europe Experts provide support/fully undertake selected or the complete package of preparation tasks - from providing advice in the development of the project idea and goals, to partner search and consortium building, recurrent review and proof-reading, preparation of administrative documents, up to the actual submission to the financing agency. Up2Europe Experts bring added value to your proposal, by making sure it is clear and consistent, understandable and appealing for non-technical people, and that it meets the requirements of the selected call for proposals.
Thanks to their solid experience in proposal writing and project implementation, in the evaluation and review of project proposals, as wells as their deep knowledge of the priorities and the selection criteria of EU programmes and instruments, Up2Europe Experts ensure a smooth and effective preparation of your proposal, resulting in the submission of a high-quality proposal.
Need a more detailed description of this service? Contact one of the Up2Europe Experts.
Project Management is much more than drafting gantt charts and filling out budget sheets. It entails several tasks that requires time and specific skills, which are not always available in the beneficiaries’ organisations. But, good news: management tasks can be easily outsourced! An Expert can assist you throughout all phases of project implementation.
Up2Europe experts provide support/fully undertake selected or the complete package of project management tasks - ranging from resources and work planning, to coordination of the consortium, maintenance of a project repository, organisation of meetings, reporting, budget monitoring, etc. - allowing you to focus on the scientific and technical activities.
Thanks to their deep knowledge of project implementation and their solid experience in the management of projects in the framework of different EU funding programmes and instruments, they can ensure an effective and efficient achievement of set objective and results.
This is just a short description, if you need more details, please ask for a Quote!
Is your project idea eligible for EU funding? Which calls for proposals or tenders can you apply for? And how much could you obtain? The Funding Opportunity Report can answer these questions! UP2EUROPE experts will scan through the most interesting and appropriate EU funding opportunities in European programmes and instruments, in order to identify those that are more relevant for your project proposal.
Funding opportunities are plentiful: calls for proposals are issued every week by the numerous EU bodies. Keeping track of each one these opportunities and recognising those that better match your project idea is not easy, but it is crucial to increase your chances of receiving the grant. Furthermore, the different programmes and instruments apply different rules in terms of partnership requirements, financing and co-financing amounts, activities that can be implemented and costs that may be included.
Thanks to their sound experience working with EU funding and their thorough knowledge of the eligibility criteria and requirements of EU programmes and instruments, and taking into account your current projects and future ambitions and your network of collaborators and partners, UP2EUROPE experts can support you in identifying the most relevant sources for funding your project ideas.
This is just a short description, if you need more details ask for a Quote!
The submission deadline is approaching and you still have doubts on the necessary support documents and their correct format or on the submission process itself? While preparing a project proposal you need a timely reply to questions regarding partnership requirements, the content of specific sections, or the eligibility of activities and costs?
An Up2Europe expert can resolve your doubts and answer your question in real time at any stage of the preparation and submission process.
By means of the service Live Support & Assistance on European Projects an UP2EUROPE expert provides real time support by email, chat or phone, easing the preparation and submission of your proposal and making sure you avoid the most common errors, increasing the chance of receiving the funds.
Training in courses and masters on European Project Management, project design, advisoring on direct and indirect European funds, presentation of various funding programmes, Project Cycle management techniques, implementation and financial reporting
We focus on a very practical approach with exercises thought for the individual needs and client case.
1. Local Authorities: Partnerships for sustainable cities 2021
1.1. Background
In 2019, the European Commission launched the programme “Local Authorities: Partnerships for sustainable cities” for a total amount of EUR 164,7 million. The program aims at strengthening local authorities by promoting decentralised cooperation involving European and partners countries’ local authorities.
In November 2018, a first call for proposals for a total amount of 53 million euro was launched leading to the signature of 16 partnerships. In February 2020, a second call for proposals for a total amount of 111 550 million euro was launched. Due to covid-19 pandemic and the following lockdown of local authority administrations all around the world, the number of applications submitted was lower than expected. As a consequence only 26 proposals were selected for a total amount of 71,7 million euro.
In December 2020 it was decided to use the remaining funds (39 849 442 euro) of the programme to launch a 3rd call for proposals subject to the present guidelines. To respect the original allocation of funds the 3rd call for proposals will be organised around three geographic lots: lot-1 Africa; lot-2 Asia and the Pacific; lot-3 Latin America and the Caribbean.
The call is based on peer-to-peer learning and/or exchanges and/or short-term deployment of public officials at subnational level towards- twinning activities including from Member Sates of the EU, fostering the exchange of good practices and transfer of know-how that could be adapted to the specificities of local authorities in each region. Action should contribute to the achievement of SDG 11 “Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” as well SDG 17 “Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development.
The global objective of the Programme “Partnership for sustainable cities” is to promote integrated urban development through partnerships built among Local Authorities of the EU Member States and partner countries in accordance with the 2030 Agenda on sustainable development.
Partnerships will support Local Authorities from partner countries to address sustainable urban development through capacity building and service-delivery. Decentralised cooperation and peer-to-peer exchanges of Local Authorities are at the heart of this approach. Actions could support the building of new partnerships or contribute to upscale long-lasting partnerships and cooperation relations.
This call will contribute to address the new political priorities of the EU, notably promoting good governance, “Green Deal”, growth, job creation and digitalisation as well as migration by focusing on the following specific objectives:
The specific objectives are:
One mandatory objective
Plus one of the 3 following objectives (each proposal need to specifically address at least one of them):
The priority of this call for proposals is to promote the EU development cooperation Rights-Based Approach, encompassing human rights, including participation and access to the decision-making process, non-discrimination (including Gender Equality) and equal access, accountability and access to the rule of law and transparency and access to information.
Applicants must clearly indicate and explain how they address this priority. This aspect will be evaluated in point 1.1 of the concept note evaluation grid (section 2.3 of these guidelines).
1.3. Financial allocation provided by the contracting authority
The overall indicative amount made available under this call for proposals is EUR 39 849 442. The contracting authority reserves the right not to award all available funds. Likewise, this amount could be increased should more funds become available.
Indicative allocation of funds by lot
Lot 1: Partnerships for sustainable cities in Sub-Saharan Africa
Total available: EUR 15 849 442
Lot 2: Partnerships for sustainable cities in Asia and the Pacific
Total available: EUR 12 000 000
Lot 3: Partnerships for sustainable cities in Latin America and the Caribbean
Total available: EUR 12 000 000
If the allocation indicated for a specific lot cannot be used due to insufficient quality or number of proposals received, the contracting authority reserves the right to reallocate the remaining funds to (an)other lot(s).
Size of grants
Any requested EU contribution (grant) under this call for proposals must fall between the following minimum and maximum amounts:
• minimum amount: EUR 1 000 000
• maximum amount: EUR 3 000 000
Any requested EU contribution (grant) under this call for proposals must fall between the following minimum and maximum percentages of total eligible costs of the action:
• Minimum percentage: 50 % of the total eligible costs of the action.
• Maximum percentage: 95% of the total eligible costs of the action (see also section 2.1.5).
The balance (i.e. the difference between the total cost of the action and the amount requested from the contracting authority) must be financed from sources other than the general budget of the Union or the European Development Fund.
In line with section 6.3.10. of the Practical Guide, neither the beneficiaries (coordinator/lead applicant and co-beneficiaries/co-applicants) nor affiliated entities must produce a profit within the framework of the action. In the context of this call, profit is defined as a surplus of the receipts over the eligible costs approved by the contracting authority when the request for payment of the balance is made. Income generated by the action may be accepted as co-financing.
In case a profit is made, the contracting authority has the right to reduce the final amount of the grant by the percentage of the profit corresponding to the final European Union contribution to the eligible costs actually incurred approved by the contracting authority (thus excluding other eligible costs declared on a simplified cost option basis).
2. Rules for this call for proposals
These guidelines set out the rules for the submission, selection and implementation of the actions financed under this call, in conformity with the practical guide, which is applicable to the present call (available on the internet at this address http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/prag/document.do?locale=en).
2.1. Eligibility criteria
There are three sets of eligibility criteria, relating to:
(1) the actors:
• The ‘lead applicant’, i.e. the entity submitting the application form (2.1.1),
• if any, its co-applicant(s) (where it is not specified otherwise the lead applicant and its co-applicant(s) are hereinafter jointly referred as ‘applicant(s)’) (2.1.1),
• and, if any, affiliated entity(ies) to the lead applicant and/or to a co-applicant(s). (2.1.2);
(2) the actions:
Actions for which a grant may be awarded (2.1.4);
(3) the costs:
2.1.1. Eligibility of applicants (i.e. lead applicant and co-applicant(s))
Lead applicant
(1) In order to be eligible for a grant, the lead applicant must:
• be a legal person and
• be a specific type of organisation such as:
(2) Potential applicants may not participate in calls for proposals or be awarded grants if they are in any of the situations listed in Section 2.6.10.1 of the PRAG.
Lead applicants, co-applicants, affiliated entities and, in case of legal entities, persons who have powers of representation, decision-making or control over the lead applicant, the co-applicants and the affiliated entities are informed that, should they be in one of the situations of early detection or exclusion according to Section 2.6.10.1 of the PRAG, personal details (name, given name if natural person, address, legal form and name and given name of the persons with powers of representation, decision-making or control, if legal person) may be registered in the early detection and exclusion system, and communicated to the persons and entities concerned in relation to the award or the execution of a grant contract. In this respect, provisionally selected lead applicants, co-applicants and affiliated entities are obliged to declare that they are not in one of the exclusion situations through a signed declaration on honour (Annex h to these guidelines) together with the full application.
In Section 2 of Annex A.1 and Section 5 of Annex A.2 (‘declaration(s) by the lead applicant’), the lead applicant must declare that the lead applicant himself, the co-applicant(s) and affiliated entity(ies) are not in any of these situations.
The lead applicant must act with at least one co-applicant as specified hereafter. The partnership must include at least one Local Authority either as lead applicant or as co-applicant.
If awarded the grant contract, the lead applicant will become the beneficiary identified as the coordinator in Annex G (special conditions) to these guidelines. The coordinator is the main interlocutor of the contracting authority. It represents and acts on behalf of any other co-beneficiary (if any) and coordinate the design and implementation of the action.
Co-applicant(s)
Under all lots, the lead applicant must act with at least one co-applicant as specified hereafter.
To be eligible, the partnership must include at least one applicant (either as lead applicant or co-applicant) established in a EU Member State and at least one applicant (either as lead applicant or co-applicant) established in the beneficiary country where the action will take place (see section 2.1.4 “Location”).
Co-applicants participate in designing and implementing the action, and the costs they incur are eligible in the same way as those incurred by the lead applicant.
In order to be eligible for a grant, the co-applicant must:
• be a legal person and
• be a specific type of organisation such as:
Local Authorities (LA); or
Association of Local Authorities (ALA), including city networks constituted in accordance with the legislation in force in the country; or
Private, public or semi-public bodies/agencies/organisations of public utility; or
Universities or a research centres constituted in accordance with the legislation in force in the country; and
• be established in one of the eligible countries or territories listed in Annex L to these guidelines.
Co-applicants must sign the mandate in Section 5 of Annex A.2 (grant application form – full application).
If awarded the grant contract, the co-applicant(s) will become beneficiary(ies) in the action (together with the coordinator lead applicant) as identified in Annex G to these guidelines - Standard grant contract.
(3) Applicants included in the lists of EU restrictive measures (see Section 2.4. of the PRAG) at the
moment of the award decision cannot be awarded the contract.
The choice of co-applicants must be justified in the proposal as part of the project design and will be taken into account in point 2.1 of the concept note evaluation grid as well as in point 1.4 (see section 2.3 of these guidelines). The composition of the partnership will be evaluated in point 4.3 and 2.4 of the full application evaluation grid (see section 2.3 of these guidelines).
Each member of a partnership must have a precise and clearly identified role in the implementation of the project. A partnership should be composed in such a way as to allow the achievement of the project objectives in the most effective and cost-efficient manner.
The role of each member of the partnership (lead and co-applicants) must be clearly explained in the proposal (description of the action). It is strongly recommended that the lead applicant and its co-applicants draw up an agreement defining their partnership as well as their respective technical and financial roles and obligations. A clear allocation of responsibilities and costs will contribute to the partnership’s success.
Please note that all information encoded in PROSPECT must be exhaustive and in line with the content of the concept note/full application. The administrative check will be performed taking into consideration only the information available in PROSPECT in sections 1 – ‘Contact’, 2 – ‘Project’ and 3 – ‘Co-applicants’. Please make sure that there are no inconsistencies between the information in PROSPECT and those in the concept note/full application text.
Complaints about administrative rejections related to this kind of inconsistencies will not be considered and will not lead to a modification of the decision.
2.1.2. Affiliated entities
The lead applicant and its co-applicant(s) may act with affiliated entity(ies).
Only the following entities may be considered as affiliated entities to the lead applicant and/or to co-applicant(s):
Only entities having a structural link with the applicants (i.e. the lead applicant or a co-applicant), in particular a legal or capital link.
This structural link encompasses mainly two notions:
(i) Control, as defined in Directive 2013/34/EU on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings:
Entities affiliated to an applicant may hence be:
(ii) Membership, i.e. the applicant is legally defined as a e.g. network, federation, association in which the proposed affiliated entities also participate or the applicant participates in the same entity (e.g. network, federation, association,…) as the proposed affiliated entities.
The structural link shall as a general rule be neither limited to the action nor established for the sole purpose of its implementation. This means that the link would exist independently of the award of the grant; it should exist before the call for proposals and remain valid after the end of the action.
By way of exception, an entity may be considered as affiliated to an applicant even if it has a structural link specifically established for the sole purpose of the implementation of the action in the case of so-called ‘sole applicants’ or ‘sole beneficiaries’. A sole applicant or a sole beneficiary is a legal entity formed by several entities (a group of entities) which together comply with the criteria for being awarded the grant. For example, an association is formed by its members.
What is not an affiliated entity?
The following are not considered entities affiliated to an applicant:
How to verify the existence of the required link with an applicant?
The affiliation resulting from control may in particular be proved on the basis of the consolidated accounts of the group of entities the applicant and its proposed affiliates belong to.
The affiliation resulting from membership may in particular be proved on the basis of the statutes or equivalent act establishing the entity (network, federation, association) which the applicant constitutes or in which the applicant participates.
If the applicants are awarded a grant contract, their affiliated entity(ies) will not become beneficiary(ies) of the action and signatory(ies) of the grant contract. However, they will participate in the design and in the implementation of the action and the costs they incur (including those incurred for implementation contracts and financial support to third parties) may be accepted as eligible costs, provided they comply with all the relevant rules already applicable to the beneficiary(ies) under the grant contract.
Affiliated entity(ies) must satisfy the same eligibility criteria as the co-applicant(s). They must sign the affiliated entity(ies) statement in Section 5 of Annex A.2 (grant application form – full application).
Note that the fact of having a structural link with the lead applicant does not prevent an organisation from being co-applicant in the partnership. It is the lead applicant's decision to define the role of the actors composing its partnership and implementing the action: co-applicants or affiliated entities.
The following entities are not applicants nor affiliated entities and do not have to sign the ‘mandate for co-applicant(s)’ or ‘affiliated entities' statement’:
Other organisations such as Civil Society Organisations (CSO) or individuals may be involved in the action. Such associates play a real role in the action but may not receive funding from the grant, with the exception of per diem or travel costs. Associates do not have to meet the eligibility criteria referred to in Section 2.1.1. Associates must be mentioned in Section 4 ‘Associates participating in the action’. of Annex A.2 (grant application form – full application).
The beneficiaries and their affiliated entities are permitted to award contracts. Associates or affiliated entity(ies) cannot be also contractors in the project. Contractors are subject to the procurement rules set out in Annex IV to the standard grant contract (Annex G to these guidelines).
Definition:
An action is composed of a set of activities.
Duration
The initial planned duration of an action may not be lower than 24 months nor exceed 36 months.
Sectors or themes
Support to good governance, Green Deal, growth, job creation and digitalisation as well as migration
Location
Action must take place in one country only
Exception can be made for cross-border activities in case of a proposal targeting actions on different sizes of a border.
Activities can target more than one city and territory of the same partner country, should the action aim at replicating, improving or expanding projects in areas of urban policy already carried out in cities or territories of the same country.
A restricted number of activities, if duly justified in the description of the action, might take place in a EU Member State or other partner countries if essential for the accomplishment of the objectives. These reasons will be examined during the evaluation process. These activities could include the organisation of workshops, seminars and dedicated events gathering multi-level of government stakeholders as well as the private sector, civil society and academia, for participatory technical and political dialogue. Upon specific requirements of targeted cities, business events to raise interest of potential investors as well fora focussing on new technologies and innovative solutions at local level could also be envisaged.
Please note that only the main action location (beneficiary country) must be encoded in PROSPECT, except in case of cross-border activities where the different countries targeted by the action must be encoded. In case more than one country is encoded in PROSPECT as action location, the proposal will be rejected.
Geographical balance could be taken into account by the European Commission at any stage of the technical evaluation.
Types of action
To be eligible for co-financing, actions under this call must comply with the objectives and the priorities of this call for proposals described in section 1.2 of these guidelines. The objectives will be reached through:
The following types of action are ineligible:
Types of activity
Applicants are invited to present all activities they consider necessary in order to achieve the objectives of this call for proposals and to obtain tangible results in the context where the selected projects will be implemented.
For indicative purpose, the following non-exhaustive list of activities that may be financed under this call:
1/ Promote urban governance
2/ Ensure social inclusiveness of cities
3/ Resilience and greening of cities
4/ Prosperity and innovation in cities
- stimulate an enabling environment for the private sector, including local firms promoting inclusive and social enterprises, business incubator and business accelerator
- Increasing job creation and entrepreneurship including through business incubator and supporting digital skills
- Providing technical support to devise innovative and financial arrangements to finance large-scale sustainable infrastructure investment and maintenance.
- Pilot projects focussing on innovation to create employment and promote socially responsible entrepreneurship.
- Promoting transition toward a digital economy and promote a related business environment
Financial support to third parties
Applicants may propose financial support to third parties in order to help achieving the objectives of the action.
The maximum amount of financial support per third party is EUR 60 000.
Under this call, financial support to third parties is not considered essential to achieve the objective of the action.
In compliance with the present guidelines and notably of any conditions or restrictions in this Section, the lead applicant should define mandatorily in Section 2.1.1 of Annex A.2:
(i) the overall objectives, the specific objective(s) and the outputs (i.e. the results) to be achieved with the financial support
(ii) the different types of activities eligible for financial support, on the basis of a fixed list
(iii) the types of persons or categories of persons which may receive financial support
(iv) the criteria for selecting these entities and giving the financial support
(v) the criteria for determining the exact amount of financial support for each third entity, and
(vi) the maximum amount which may be given
(vii) the control system for verifying the eligibility of costs.
In all events, the mandatory conditions set above for giving financial support (points (i) to (vii)) have to be strictly defined in the grant contract as to avoid any exercise of discretion.
Visibility
The applicants must take all necessary steps to publicise the fact that the European Union has financed or co-financed the action. As far as possible, actions that are wholly or partially funded by the European Union must incorporate information and communication activities designed to raise the awareness of specific or general audiences of the reasons for the action and the EU support for the action in the country or region concerned, as well as the results and the impact of this support.
Applicants must comply with the objectives and priorities and guarantee the visibility of the EU financing (see the Communication and Visibility Manual for EU external actions specified and published by the European Commission at https://ec.europa.eu/international-partnerships/system/files/communication-visibility-requirements-2018_en.pdf
Number of applications and grants per applicants / affiliated entities
An organisation can only submit one proposal either as lead applicant or as co-applicant/affiliated entity under this call for proposals. Should this be the case, the Evaluation Committee will only consider the first proposal arrived (based on the date and hour of submission) and any other proposal will be rejected.
It is the responsibility of each lead applicant to verify that its co-applicants/affiliated entities are not involved in any other application under this call for proposals. The Contracting Authority cannot be considered as responsible for the unauthorized use of the EuropeAid ID or name of an entity in a proposal.
Only ‘eligible costs’ can be covered by a grant. The categories of costs that are eligible and non-eligible are indicated below. The budget is both a cost estimate and an overall ceiling for ‘eligible costs’.
The reimbursement of eligible costs must be based on actual costs incurred by the beneficiary(ies) and affiliated entity(ies).
Recommendations to award a grant are always subject to the condition that the checks preceding the signing of the grant contract do not reveal problems requiring changes to the budget (such as arithmetical errors, inaccuracies, unrealistic costs and ineligible costs). The checks may give rise to requests for clarification and may lead the contracting authority to impose modifications or reductions to address such mistakes or inaccuracies. It is not possible to increase the grant or the percentage of EU co-financing as a result of these corrections.
It is therefore in the applicants' interest to provide a realistic and cost-effective budget.
Eligible direct costs
To be eligible under this call for proposals, costs must comply with the provisions of Article 14 of the general conditions to the standard grant contract (see Annex G of the guidelines).
The applicants (and where applicable their affiliated entities) agree that the expenditure verification(s) referred to in Article 15.7 of the general conditions to the standard grant contract (see Annex G of the guidelines) will be carried out by any external body authorised by the European Commission.
Salary costs of the personnel working for local authorities may be eligible to the extent that they relate to the cost of activities which the relevant public authority would not carry out if the action were not undertaken.
Contingency reserve
The budget may include a contingency reserve not exceeding 5 % of the estimated direct eligible costs. It can only be used with the prior written authorisation of the contracting authority.
Eligible indirect costs
The indirect costs incurred in carrying out the action may be eligible for flat-rate funding, but the total must not exceed 7 % of the estimated total eligible direct costs. Indirect costs are eligible provided that they do not include costs assigned to another budget heading in the standard grant contract. The lead applicant may be asked to justify the percentage requested before the grant contract is signed. However, once the flat rate has been fixed in the special conditions of the grant contract, no supporting documents need to be provided.
If any of the applicants or affiliated entity(ies) is in receipt of an operating grant financed by the EU, it may not claim indirect costs on its incurred costs within the proposed budget for the action.
Contributions in kind
Contributions in kind mean the provision of goods or services to beneficiaries or affiliated entities free of charge by a third party. As contributions in kind do not involve any expenditure for beneficiaries or affiliated entities, they are normally not eligible costs.
Notwithstanding under this call for proposals, contributions in kind may not be treated as co-financing.
However, if the description of the action as proposed includes contributions in kind, the contributions have to be made.
Ineligible costs
The following costs are not eligible:
Ethics clauses and Code of Conduct
a) Absence of conflict of interest
The applicant must not be affected by any conflict of interest and must have no equivalent relation in that respect with other applicants or parties involved in the actions. Any attempt by an applicant to obtain confidential information, enter into unlawful agreements with competitors or influence the evaluation committee or the contracting authority during the process of examining, clarifying, evaluating and comparing applications will lead to the rejection of its application and may result in administrative penalties according to the Financial Regulation in force.
b) Respect for human rights as well as environmental legislation and core labour standards
The applicant and its staff must comply with human rights. In particular and in accordance with the applicable act, applicants who have been awarded contracts must comply with the environmental legislation including multilateral environmental agreements, and with the core labour standards as applicable and as defined in the relevant International Labour Organisation conventions (such as the conventions on freedom of association and collective bargaining; elimination of forced and compulsory labour; abolition of child labour).
Zero tolerance for sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment:
The European Commission applies a policy of 'zero tolerance' in relation to all wrongful conduct which has an impact on the professional credibility of the applicant.
Physical abuse or punishment, or threats of physical abuse, sexual abuse or exploitation, harassment and verbal abuse, as well as other forms of intimidation shall be prohibited.
c) Anti-corruption and anti-bribery
The applicant shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations and codes relating to anti-bribery and anti-corruption. The European Commission reserves the right to suspend or cancel project financing if corrupt practices of any kind are discovered at any stage of the award process or during the execution of a contract and if the contracting authority fails to take all appropriate measures to remedy the situation. For the purposes of this provision, ‘corrupt practices’ are the offer of a bribe, gift, gratuity or commission to any person as an inducement or reward for performing or refraining from any act relating to the award of a contract or execution of a contract already concluded with the contracting authority.
d) Unusual commercial expenses
Applications will be rejected or contracts terminated if it emerges that the award or execution of a contract has given rise to unusual commercial expenses. Such unusual commercial expenses are commissions not mentioned in the main contract or not stemming from a properly concluded contract referring to the main contract, commissions not paid in return for any actual and legitimate service, commissions remitted to a tax haven, commissions paid to a payee who is not clearly identified or commissions paid to a company which has every appearance of being a front company.
Grant beneficiaries found to have paid unusual commercial expenses on projects funded by the European Union are liable, depending on the seriousness of the facts observed, to have their contracts terminated or to be permanently excluded from receiving EU/EDF funds.
e) Breach of obligations, irregularities or fraud
The contracting authority reserves the right to suspend or cancel the procedure, where the award procedure proves to have been subject to substantial breach of obligations, irregularities or fraud. If substantial breach of obligations, irregularities or fraud are discovered after the award of the contract, the contracting authority may refrain from concluding the contract.
(TRUNCATED)
Expert - Project Development & EU Funding Consultant in participatory processes
MY SUCCESSFUL EXPERIENCES IN COMMUNITY GRANTS ...
Please Log In to See This Section