Scope:
Background
As part of the EU efforts to provide more legal channels for the growing number of displaced persons in need of international protection, the European Commission[1] invited Member States to explore ways to establish private sponsorship schemes where civil society organisations provide support for the settlement and integration for persons in need of protection. In line with the conclusions of a study recently carried out for the European Commission[2] on private sponsorship, the European Commission proposes to provide funding for fostering the integration of persons in need of protection through private sponsorship schemes.
The concept of private sponsorship is not clearly and easily defined. The above-mentioned study identified a wide range of definitions of private sponsorship and an equally varied array of practices. The number of different sponsorship schemes has proliferated across the EU and they have a wide variety of characteristics in the eligibility criteria of the sponsor and beneficiary, responsibilities of the sponsor, and in the status granted and associated rights. Private sponsorship schemes implemented to date in Europe can be divided into four main categories: humanitarian corridors; ad-hoc schemes for specific religious groups; specific family reunification schemes; and community-based sponsorship. Given the diverse range of admission schemes that have operated in Member States with a sponsorship component, sponsorship is best described as a way of admitting persons for humanitarian reasons, rather than as a separate channel itself. Private sponsorship schemes share one common characteristic: they involve a transfer of responsibility from government agencies to private actors for some elements of the identification, pre-departure, reception, or integration process of beneficiaries. With a strong involvement of local communities and civil society organisations, these schemes allow strengthened capacities at local level to provide adequate support for integration and usually lead to better integration outcomes of the persons concerned.
The use of private sponsorship is expanding within the territory of the European Union, and over the period 2013-2018 the number of persons admitted under private sponsorship in the EU exceeded 30,000, with over three quarters admitted by Germany alone (the other Member States include the United Kingdom, Portugal, Italy, Ireland, France, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Poland, and Belgium).
Topic 1 of this call for proposals focuses on one of the key objectives of private sponsorship schemes: enabling better integration prospects for private sponsorship beneficiaries.
Objectives
The objectives of topic 1 of this call for proposals are to support transnational projects that:
Proposals should indicate whether they relate to objective a) or b) mentioned above.
Actions:
Outcomes
Further considerations applicable to this topic
Future projects should take into account the work to be undertaken by EASO building on their first pilot project on private sponsorship programmes which started in December 2017.
In case proposals address objective (b) above (i.e. supporting the design and implementation of new pilot schemes on private sponsorship), their focus should not be only on pre-departure measures. Proposals submitted under this objective by a NGO or international organisation as lead applicant/coordinator should involve directly (as member of the consortium) or indirectly Member State’s authorities concerned.
Given the potential overlap with topic 2 in relation to integration measures through involvement of local communities (see below), potential applicants should take into account the specificities of topic 1, which focuses only on integration of persons in need of protection through (existing or to be developed) private sponsorship schemes, while topic 2 relates to third-country nationals in general.
The Commission would welcome large or small projects in terms of budget and number of partners. The Commission considers also valuable that organisations representing migrants are involved in the project.
Moreover, the Commission considers positively that applicants build on the experience of private sponsorship already in place in other countries, for example through mutual learning activities, including from some organisations based in non-EU countries, such as Switzerland and Canada, given the relevant experience in terms of resettlement and private sponsorship.
Applicants are also invited to take note of, to avoid duplication with, and to build on projects previously funded by the EU in relation to integration and to take into account the study on the feasibility and added-value of sponsorship schemes as a possible pathway to safe channels for admission to the EU, including resettlement[3].
Applicants may find additional information at:
[1]COM(2017) 558 final
[2]Study on the feasibility and added value of sponsorship schemes as a possible pathway to safe channels for admission to the EU, including resettlement, available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1dbb0873-d349-11e8-9424-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-77978210
[3]See previous footnote.
Please Log In to See This Section